thanks misty! I agree

Posted by Kay T on April 18, 2002 at 20:34:39:

In Reply to: Re: Idaho Statesman posted by Misty on April 18, 2002 at 18:39:22:

: I am confused, RLH's posts state nothing about being embarrased at her post being sent to the newspaper. Am I missing something here? Maybe I read over her previous posts too quickly. Also, her post here seemed to have nothing that should cause her embarrasment if her claims are true(and it seems like she's a pretty honest person from her postings below). If it's true, and she was misquoted, then I would think it would help her, not hinder her. However, If I am wrong, then please, show me the post where Ms. Hatcher was upset about this. As far as I can see, and I always welcome rebuttal, it looks as though Ms. Hatcher was more upset about the article in the paper more than anything else. Maybe what you read in it is different than what I read in it. And, I also believe that there is no law prohibiting the webmistress using articles as she wishes from her own site. Don't take this wrong, if you have proof from Ms. Hatcher saying that she didn't appreciate what LLB did, then by all means provide it. However, if it is just YOUR feelings, then it might be a good idea not to assume she is embarrased by what people have said here concerning the issue of LLB sending the artice from here to the newspaper.

Follow Ups:

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:
: : I am confused, RLH's posts state nothing about being embarrased at her post being sent to the newspaper. Am I missing something here? Maybe I read over her previous posts too quickly. Also, her post here seemed to have nothing that should cause her embarrasment if her claims are true(and it seems like she's a pretty honest person from her postings below). If it's true, and she was misquoted, then I would think it would help her, not hinder her. However, If I am wrong, then please, show me the post where Ms. Hatcher was upset about this. As far as I can see, and I always welcome rebuttal, it looks as though Ms. Hatcher was more upset about the article in the paper more than anything else. Maybe what you read in it is different than what I read in it. And, I also believe that there is no law prohibiting the webmistress using articles as she wishes from her own site. Don't take this wrong, if you have proof from Ms. Hatcher saying that she didn't appreciate what LLB did, then by all means provide it. However, if it is just YOUR feelings, then it might be a good idea not to assume she is embarrased by what people have said here concerning the issue of LLB sending the artice from here to the newspaper.