About the Worst
I cannot hope to equal the voters' comments on this category. I'd be tempted to tame them down too much. To say they got hot under their collars over these six covers would be to grossly understate the matter. While a much-beloved Regency Romance author pouted, "It's not fair to limit the choice to only one!", limit we did.
Reader Cheryl managed to summarize most voters' comments in this category by saying:
""I had no trouble making a decision in any category except this one. They are all so terrible, can we have a six-way tie? I mean really! The Neanderthal in the Viking helmet; the androgynous couple in the Cocoon swimming pool; the deer-in-the-headlights gunslinger, [etc.,]. How did that ugly man with his "duh" expression get approved for poor Eileen's cover (Never Trust A Rake)? And what's with the beefed-up Ted Danson look-alike (My Lord Destiny)? 'I'm going to the coast, it'll be windy, I need my cape. What's that? Where's my shirt? I don' need no stinkin' shirt!' But I have to vote for the last one, the Jolly Viking. He's the only one that makes me want to smack him. Waggle that finger at me, will you? Yeah, waggle this, babe!"
A well-known historical romance had this to say about all the "worst" nominees, "My Gawd! They're all hideous! The models look deformed and the bull's horns are hysterical. Yeah, I'd read a book on a bus where the guy on the cover is giving the old lady across the aisle from you the finger. Sheesh. The muddy brown abortion (Seekers of the Dawn) has to beat them all, though. What the hell was the publisher thinking?? Romance in a flowing sewer main?"
Of these hated covers, three were more hated than the others. As you might have gathered from the comments above, the covers that received the most vehement negative responses, in order, were Seekers Of The Dawn, Beloved Warrior and Bewitched Viking. I'm sure you'll agree that "hate" is not too strong a word after reading more of our voters' comments.
At the outset, I should say that not everyone who voted thought it was a good idea to have a "worst" category. While most who voted understand that this category is a way to express their displeasure to the publishers, some readers, and at least one author, who "didn't think any of them were that bad," wrote us that, "I choose not to vote in this category, because I don't know who might be hurt by it. Hurting an author, who is already upset over a bad cover would kill me."
However, as you'll discover below, some of these covers are bad enough to prevent readers from buying the books altogether. Surely publishers need to know that they are hurting sales with some of these horrendous choices.
Seekers of the Dawn "won" as worst cover by a hair. This is an electronic book, and our publisher had qualms about even including an e-book in the "worst" category because, budget-wise, these new publishers cannot compete with print publishers. But, bad is bad. And here are some more of the comments we received about Seekers of the Dawn:
no art credit
|About the cover with the 2nd highest number of votes, Beloved Warrior, we heard the following:
|In third place came Bewitched Viking, about which we received many comments. Here are the highlights:
no art credit
|Everyone who voted for the fourth-place Forever cover as "worst," mentions the pointed gun as what they find most offensive on a romance cover. Here are some of the specific comments:
No art credit
no art credit
|Our fifth place finisher inspired these comments, among others:
||My Lord Destiny received the fewest votes as "worst" cover. A few voters even wrote in to ask why it was included in the "worst" category. Although our publisher agrees with the assessment that the man looks like "Ted Danson on steroids," some readers found this a dark, moody, and sexy cover.|
I have a suggestion to make to the artists and to the publishers. I do not think that you are showing these covers to enough women who read and buy romance novels. Each of these covers touched a hair trigger among the women readers. The women are very specific about exactly what they found offensive. I'm not sure these aspects would occur to a man. Many of these covers strike me as what a man might imagine a woman would find attractive. This is probably as flawed an idea as asking a woman what a man is going to find attractive in another woman. The whole world would be more easily married if each sex could really assess the other that effectively.
I must agree with the voters about all six covers. I never picked up a single one of them and never read the blurb of any of their story lines. I certainly saw these on the bookshelves but quickly passed them by. My vote is for My Lord Destiny because I don't like anything about the man depicted: his hair, his facial features, his pumped-up build, his expression, his lack of shirt, his cape and the fact that no one would dress like this for standing on a cliff. Most telling of all, I bought not a single book out of the six, not even the discounted or used copies of them I saw for sale.
We've already begun work on covers produced for year 2000 releases. We've set up a ballot which will stay online throughout the year. If you find a cover you love, or a cover you hate, go to the ballot, fill it out, and send it in.
with technical assistance from Sandi Morris
|Return to previous page|
|Continue this discussion on our Potpourri Message Board|