AAR
Click here for full forums index
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 


9 in 09 for October
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    AAR Forum Index -> Romance Potpourri Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
library addict



Joined: 06 Dec 2008
Posts: 687

PostPosted: Sun Oct 04, 2009 2:56 am    Post subject: 9 in 09 for October Reply with quote

9th book by an author:
Manhunter by Loreth Anne White: This book has languished in my TBR pile for almost a year and is one of the reasons I picked the Ultimate 9 Challenge for my Wild Card category. I had high hopes for it as the story starts out strong. I liked the fact the book is set in Canada and that the characters, with the exception of the villain, are all Canadian. Sadly, the hero and heroine aren’t as layered as the early chapters suggest and the omnipotence of the villain grows old very quickly Rolling Eyes . There was more than one instance in the latter half of the book when I wanted to throw it against the wall Sad

Normally I would simply think…oh well. But I ended up disliking the book more precisely because I did enjoy the beginning and the setting, which made the letdown more acute.

8 down, 1 to go…
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
maggie b.



Joined: 23 Mar 2007
Posts: 1355

PostPosted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 8:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I can't find the original thread for 9 in 09, even using search. Does anyone have a link to it??

maggie b
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Susanna Kearsley



Joined: 03 Nov 2008
Posts: 50
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 8:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Maggie, the original post went up January 10, 2009.

I think this is the link for it:
http://likesbooks.com/boards/viewtopic.php?t=4437
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
maggie b.



Joined: 23 Mar 2007
Posts: 1355

PostPosted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks so much Susanna! I am not officially "in" since I never signed up but I was curious to see if I had met the criteria anyway.

I'm going to have to go back and review what I have read!

maggie b.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tee



Joined: 22 Mar 2007
Posts: 2497

PostPosted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

maggie b. wrote:
I am not officially "in" since I never signed up but I was curious to see if I had met the criteria anyway.

This challenge, I believe, was meant to be fun, maggie, and you're officially "in" if you've met the guidelines. I don't think MrsFairfax would exclude you at all. In fact, I'll bet you're way ahead of me in what you've read for it and I "officially" signed up. Laughing
_________________
Just because a path is well beaten is no proof it's the right one.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sandlynn



Joined: 23 Mar 2007
Posts: 1311
Location: Washington, D.C.

PostPosted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 3:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

We'll have to do a "10 in 10" challenge and come up with some new categories to challenge us, although I'm always up for "authors new to you," since that's a big help in tackling my TBR pile.
_________________
Howzit goin', toots?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tee



Joined: 22 Mar 2007
Posts: 2497

PostPosted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 4:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sandlynn wrote:
We'll have to do a "10 in 10" challenge and come up with some new categories to challenge us, although I'm always up for "authors new to you," since that's a big help in tackling my TBR pile.

New authors always would be good for me and "10 in 10" sounds great.
_________________
Just because a path is well beaten is no proof it's the right one.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Schola



Joined: 10 Jun 2007
Posts: 1867

PostPosted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 1:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

+IHS+

Here's what I've managed since the last time I posted:

New-to-Me Author: Lisa Marie Rice

I started with Midnight Angel, which launched the most satisfying glom I've had since I discovered Jo Beverley. She writes RomSuspense very well, and I can see why so many readers thought she was a man.

New-to-Me Genre: Erotic Romance

Since reading Rice was such a great experience, I thought I'd try Sarah McCarty next. Now I really wish I hadn't. Sad The leads have the kind of sex I'd never want to have in real life, so why would I want to read about it?

* * *

Well, it seems I've completed my first two categories and now only have to find a book with "Sin" or "Wicked" in the title and another with "Mistress" and whatever our other word was. Smile
_________________
"To be in a romance is to be in uncongenial surroundings. To be born into this earth is to be born into uncongenial surroundings, hence to be born into a romance." (G.K. Chesterton)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tee



Joined: 22 Mar 2007
Posts: 2497

PostPosted: Wed Oct 14, 2009 12:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think I'm failing here, guys. I've probably read about 20 new authors or so this year. Could that substitute and qualify for the other classifications? I didn't think so.

I tried my first new-to-me genre--a paranormal. I chose an author who everyone raves about--Nalini Singh. Ugh, it didn't work. I can't make it thru the book. Does attempting to read it, but not finishing, count toward the challenge?

I have to really get rolling here with some other genres; but I've read quite a few in the past already, so there's not a lot to choose from. And I still have the wildcard class left yet. I am a little behind, I think. Shocked
_________________
Just because a path is well beaten is no proof it's the right one.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
maggie b.



Joined: 23 Mar 2007
Posts: 1355

PostPosted: Wed Oct 14, 2009 6:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Edited to Finish, Posted before complete LOL

I've done Category One, New to Me Authors, with:

Jane Austin Ruined My Life, Beth Patillo
Bitten, Kelley Armstrong
The Season, Sara Maclean
Fools Rush In, Kristan Higgins
Bad Girl, Michelle Jaffe
Talk Nerdy to Me Vicki Lewis Thompson

I'm not sure about the classification of the first three but the last three are definitely romance novels. So Yeah! I made my first category.

For Category three I am doing Covers and so far have read:

Poison Study by Maria V. Snyder.

I have "A Spell for Susannah" on order from Amazon and two "The English Wife" and a book by Stef Ann Holmes on order from the library. I did not pick the first place winners but "Spell for Susannah" is called a seventh place "winner" so I hope it counts.

Under Category 2 I am doing inspirational romance and have read "Whirlwind" by Cathy Marie Hake and have a bunch on order by other authors. They will be sort of two for ones since I don't normally read Westerns and all three will be Westerns. I think I have technically finished this category since I have read "The Tea Rose" and "The Winter Rose" by Jennifer Donnelly (both set in late 1800's) in England. It's complete if I count "The Luxe", "Rumors" and "Envy" by Anna Godbersen (set in late 1800's America). Splendor, which finishes the series, will be released in October, so I will have read four books set in the gilded age, a new to me era, as well as 2 set in England in the same time frame. However, the "Luxe" books, while romantic, are YA fiction, not really romance, so I guess they don't count. Sigh.

The hardest part of the challenge for me was finding books in categories I haven't read. I have at one point or other read books set in just about every era. However, since I don't normally read Westerns or Gilded Age books I counted them as "new to me". In fact, if it weren't for this challenge I wouldn't be reading the Westerns at all.

Another hard part for me was the romance criteria. I have read many new authors, many "new to me" genres this year. Sadly, most have not been romance novels.

maggie b.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Schola



Joined: 10 Jun 2007
Posts: 1867

PostPosted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 10:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tee wrote:
I tried my first new-to-me genre--a paranormal. I chose an author who everyone raves about--Nalini Singh. Ugh, it didn't work. I can't make it thru the book. Does attempting to read it, but not finishing, count toward the challenge?


Since DNF is an accepted review grade, I'd say it does. Smile You can still tell us what you thought of it and why you couldn't finish it.

PS -- I really think you'll have better luck with Kresley Cole! Very Happy
_________________
"To be in a romance is to be in uncongenial surroundings. To be born into this earth is to be born into uncongenial surroundings, hence to be born into a romance." (G.K. Chesterton)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tee



Joined: 22 Mar 2007
Posts: 2497

PostPosted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 10:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Schola wrote:
Since DNF is an accepted review grade, I'd say it does. Smile You can still tell us what you thought of it and why you couldn't finish it.
PS -- I really think you'll have better luck with Kresley Cole! Very Happy

Thanks, Schola. I like your thinking. In my next life, I'd like you to be one of my teachers, even if just for the grading system. And I'll take you up on that and try Kresley Cole.
_________________
Just because a path is well beaten is no proof it's the right one.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
maggie b.



Joined: 23 Mar 2007
Posts: 1355

PostPosted: Fri Oct 23, 2009 10:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Argh! Pulling hair. Gnashing teeth. I read "Lucy get Her Life Back" by Stef Ann Holms to fulfill the cover contest winners category and I already had three! Hours wasted on a book I didn't even like! Ah, the importance of keeping good records.

maggie b.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tee



Joined: 22 Mar 2007
Posts: 2497

PostPosted: Fri Oct 23, 2009 10:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Schola wrote:
...I really think you'll have better luck with Kresley Cole! Very Happy

Okay, Schola. I took your advice and tried one of Kresley Cole's books. I will say that I could take her style of writing much better than Singh's. But that's where the compliments end. I just cannot handle that kind of paranormal story--from anyone, I guess. Every time I turned the page and encountered another scene of animal/human speak, I just kept saying "Eeeew." Shocked So I believe it's safe to say that genre is not for me. I'll continue looking for a genre I've not yet tried, but the pickings are slim, since I think I've at least attempted them all at least once in the past.

But thanks for the suggestion. One never knows until it's tried.
_________________
Just because a path is well beaten is no proof it's the right one.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Schola



Joined: 10 Jun 2007
Posts: 1867

PostPosted: Fri Oct 23, 2009 11:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tee wrote:
Schola wrote:
...I really think you'll have better luck with Kresley Cole! Very Happy

Okay, Schola. I took your advice and tried one of Kresley Cole's books. I will say that I could take her style of writing much better than Singh's. But that's where the compliments end. I just cannot handle that kind of paranormal story--from anyone, I guess. Every time I turned the page and encountered another scene of animal/human speak, I just kept saying "Eeeew." Shocked So I believe it's safe to say that genre is not for me. I'll continue looking for a genre I've not yet tried, but the pickings are slim, since I think I've at least attempted them all at least once in the past.

But thanks for the suggestion. One never knows until it's tried.


I'm sorry to hear that, Tee. May I ask which book you tried? I'm also trying to figure out what you mean by "animal/human speak." Smile
_________________
"To be in a romance is to be in uncongenial surroundings. To be born into this earth is to be born into uncongenial surroundings, hence to be born into a romance." (G.K. Chesterton)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    AAR Forum Index -> Romance Potpourri Forum All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group