Updating the Special Title Listings

We’re pleased to announce that after nearly two years, the first of what will hopefully be many updates, have been completed for four of the Special Title Lists: Beta Heroes, Favorite Funnies, Marriages of Convenience, and Troubled Marriages. A big thanks to all of the AAR readers who took the time to send in their suggestions for additions to these four lists. We’ll be opening up additional lists on Monday, October 15, so make certain to check back here on that day.

We have incorporated most, but not all, of the recommendations submitted by readers onto the revised lists. While a couple of readers wrote on their submission form that we should just accept everything the readers entered, we used the three criteria stated at the top of the submission form when reviewing the submissions. Any additions to the list have to be: (1) the best of the best, (2) stand the test of time, and (3) actually fit the list for which they were submitted.

The Best of the Best. The Special Title lists are meant to represent the best of the best in each of the categories. Any book that received a grade of B- or higher at AAR, and that fit the category, was automatically added to the list. If a title was submitted that was not reviewed at AAR, or received a grade of C+ or lower at AAR, we searched a large number of other sites to determine an overall consensus on a title. For example, if a book received a C+ at AAR but had high reviews at numerous other sites, we added it to the list. Conversely, if a book had a D- at AAR, and was a DNF or poorly graded book on a number of other sites, we did not add it.

Stand the test of time.
We added a number of titles to the lists that were published years before the last updates were made. However, we did not include some that were submitted and described either in reviews or by the submitter as reading as “dated.” A book that’s very “dated” does not stand the test of time.

Fits the Category. Finally, the book actually needs to fit the category and this is where the work truly began. We read multiple reviews and descriptions of each title you submitted to get a feel for the books, and to make certain that they were appropriate for the list for which they were nominated. If a book was nominated for the Favorite Funnies category but uniformly was described as being a “tear-jerker” or “bleak” or “grim,” with no descriptions of being funny ever appearing in reviews, it was not added to the list, even if it had a grade of B- or higher at AAR.

There were a number of submissions for the Troubled Marriages and Marriage of Convenience categories that did not actually fit those categories. For example, while many of these titles had good reviews at AAR or other locations, they were not marriages of convenience; instead, they were shotgun marriages in that they, “are marriages that are brought about either because the bride is pregnant or because she has been hopelessly compromised.” In contrast, the Special Title Listing definition for a Marriage of Convenience is a marriage “that comes about because of circumstances. In most romances of this type, neither the hero nor the heroine desires the marriage, but circumstances such as lack of money or child custody make the marriage desirable. Sexual relations are not assumed to be part of the bargain; in fact, often there is a stipulation raised that the marriage will be dissolved (unconsummated) after a certain period of time. Sex does not negate the designation of marriage of convenience, however. Especially in contemporaries, sex may be considered part of the arrangement.” There are also situations outside of the above that make the marriage a convenience for both parties. In some cases the marriage is agreed to by both parties and it is expected that the marriage be real in every way except in true love. One such instance are Mail Order Brides and they can be found on this list. In cases where the titles fell into the Shotgun Marriage listing, we have kept the titles on file and will add the titles to the list when we update it later this year.

Similarly, there were a few submissions for the Troubled Marriages list that did not fit the definition of Troubled Marriages in which, “the couple is estranged, separated, or even divorced early in the story and, having worked out their differences or problems in communication, reunited at the end. “ Marriages in which the heroine (or hero) was married to a serial killer, escaped from the marriage, and fell in love with someone else do not meet that definition as these are all cases where a character has been married before, but then finds someone else.

It is with great pleasure that we can say that thirty-eight new titles have been added to the Marriage of Convenience list, twenty-two titles to the Troubled Marriage list, ninety-four titles were added to Favorite Funnies and forty-eight titles were added to Beta Heroes. We had fun reading all of your submissions, and we look to reading more when the next lists open on Monday, October 15. See you then!

– Rike Horstmann, Cindy Smith, and LinnieGayl Kimmel

This entry was posted in All About Romance, Cindy AAR, LinnieGayl AAR, Rike AAR and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to Updating the Special Title Listings

  1. maggie b. says:

    Thank you for all the hard work that went into this. Can’t wait to see the new titles!

  2. mari says:

    This is great! And I haven’t read alot of these! Thank you so much for this!

  3. Kathy says:

    Thanks to all of you at AAR and to the posters who suggested updating these lists. I, for one, have found them invaluable when searching for certain themes.

  4. Karat says:

    There are already a couple of titles from the new updates that I want to read! Thanks, AAR team, for all the effort!

  5. maryann says:

    Thanks for all of your hard work – I’m sure it gets tedious at times. I’m headed to the lists now.

  6. RobinB says:

    So glad to see the lists have returned! I’m also delighted to see those great photos/illustrations that accompany the lists. When I clicked on the Favorite Funnies list and saw those wonderful photos of the late, great Peter Boyle and Madeline Kahn in “Young Frankenstein”–well, thanks again for the return of a favorite feature! :)

  7. LinnieGayl says:

    You’re welcome, all. While working on the lists I discovered a few I definitely want to read myself.

  8. Caryl says:

    Good work! Thanks so much. AAR is the only website that I visit daily!

  9. Gale says:

    Thanks for all the hard work to compile this data. I love it. I very much appreciate the added work to include the AAR ratings. I’m off to study the lists now to find so new titles to add to my TBR stack! I agree with Carly and others, the AAR site is my most frequent stop on the web.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>