<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Agency Pricing and EBook Lending Limits Mean for Readers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.likesbooks.com/blog/Index.php?feed=rss2&#038;p=6051" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.likesbooks.com/blog/?p=6051</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 12:31:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leigh</title>
		<link>http://www.likesbooks.com/blog/?p=6051&#038;cpage=2#comment-30701</link>
		<dc:creator>Leigh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 12:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.likesbooks.com/blog/?p=6051#comment-30701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DJ, I love the convenience and the immediacy of my kindle probably more then you.  I like printed book fine, but I wouldn&#039;t say that I have a preference for them.  However, I am now buying the least expensive way I can.  If my library has the book, then I am getting it from them.  If not I look for used, or discounted. 

I didn&#039;t realize that the Nook could download library books.  I have the kindle so I haven&#039;t really tried to check out e-books.  Still it is disturbing about the price change by Harper Collins. 

E-books cost seems to be on very ones mind.  I run across several articles lately about this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DJ, I love the convenience and the immediacy of my kindle probably more then you.  I like printed book fine, but I wouldn&#8217;t say that I have a preference for them.  However, I am now buying the least expensive way I can.  If my library has the book, then I am getting it from them.  If not I look for used, or discounted. </p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t realize that the Nook could download library books.  I have the kindle so I haven&#8217;t really tried to check out e-books.  Still it is disturbing about the price change by Harper Collins. </p>
<p>E-books cost seems to be on very ones mind.  I run across several articles lately about this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJ</title>
		<link>http://www.likesbooks.com/blog/?p=6051&#038;cpage=2#comment-30660</link>
		<dc:creator>DJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Mar 2011 02:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.likesbooks.com/blog/?p=6051#comment-30660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, I think that policy is criminal. A library book should be able to be loaned as many times as it lasts, whether it is in print or electronic format. That is the point of a public library. And libraries have existed for a long time in conjunction with for profit book sales, I think only to the good of book sales. 

For me, the only advantage of my e-reader is its portability and the ability to also borrow library books on it. I bought a Nook instead of a Kindle, simply because I can check out library books on it. I liked the Kindle machine much better. 

But it annoys me to no end when electronic files cost the same as a lovely, print book. I really do feel that the printed books have a greater value than an electronic file. And, as you pointed out, the costs to produce them must be less, since they save on physical costs and shipping.

I fear that if libraries are prohibited from being able to lend e-books they have legitimately purchased, that I will find my e-reader is only a novelty toy, and that I will be returning to printed books. I&#039;m sure my cash-strapped library system can&#039;t afford to keep re-purchasing the same titles over and over again. Or if they did want to do so, it would simply mean a much narrower pool of available titles, since they wouldn&#039;t have the money to broaden their collection beyond the very most popular titles.

I prefer to read hard copy books anyway, I just wanted the portability of having many with me on a trip in such a small machine. But if publishers are going to let greed affect their treatment of customers to such a degree, pff... I&#039;m not so enamored of reading electronically that I won&#039;t let it go.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I think that policy is criminal. A library book should be able to be loaned as many times as it lasts, whether it is in print or electronic format. That is the point of a public library. And libraries have existed for a long time in conjunction with for profit book sales, I think only to the good of book sales. </p>
<p>For me, the only advantage of my e-reader is its portability and the ability to also borrow library books on it. I bought a Nook instead of a Kindle, simply because I can check out library books on it. I liked the Kindle machine much better. </p>
<p>But it annoys me to no end when electronic files cost the same as a lovely, print book. I really do feel that the printed books have a greater value than an electronic file. And, as you pointed out, the costs to produce them must be less, since they save on physical costs and shipping.</p>
<p>I fear that if libraries are prohibited from being able to lend e-books they have legitimately purchased, that I will find my e-reader is only a novelty toy, and that I will be returning to printed books. I&#8217;m sure my cash-strapped library system can&#8217;t afford to keep re-purchasing the same titles over and over again. Or if they did want to do so, it would simply mean a much narrower pool of available titles, since they wouldn&#8217;t have the money to broaden their collection beyond the very most popular titles.</p>
<p>I prefer to read hard copy books anyway, I just wanted the portability of having many with me on a trip in such a small machine. But if publishers are going to let greed affect their treatment of customers to such a degree, pff&#8230; I&#8217;m not so enamored of reading electronically that I won&#8217;t let it go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leigh</title>
		<link>http://www.likesbooks.com/blog/?p=6051&#038;cpage=2#comment-30588</link>
		<dc:creator>Leigh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 16:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.likesbooks.com/blog/?p=6051#comment-30588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A friend just brought this to my attention:

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/story/2011/03/18/ns-library-ebooks.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A friend just brought this to my attention:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/story/2011/03/18/ns-library-ebooks.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/story/2011/03/18/ns-library-ebooks.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: farmwifetwo</title>
		<link>http://www.likesbooks.com/blog/?p=6051&#038;cpage=2#comment-29972</link>
		<dc:creator>farmwifetwo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 12:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.likesbooks.com/blog/?p=6051#comment-29972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Well, would you believe that I occasionally get letters from American readers correcting my spelling – my books use UK English &quot;

Elizabeth, this made me smile. I have an online friend that when she started her blog wrote in UK English and put the US equivalent&#039;s in quotes. I have to admit I went &quot;huh&quot;, but I never thought about how different Canadien, eh? English can be from the US version. We seem to use a combination of British and US.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Well, would you believe that I occasionally get letters from American readers correcting my spelling – my books use UK English &#8221;</p>
<p>Elizabeth, this made me smile. I have an online friend that when she started her blog wrote in UK English and put the US equivalent&#8217;s in quotes. I have to admit I went &#8220;huh&#8221;, but I never thought about how different Canadien, eh? English can be from the US version. We seem to use a combination of British and US.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tahyun</title>
		<link>http://www.likesbooks.com/blog/?p=6051&#038;cpage=2#comment-29954</link>
		<dc:creator>Tahyun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 04:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.likesbooks.com/blog/?p=6051#comment-29954</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I dont have an ereader but I am thinking about getting one. As for pricing, I would not mind buying an ebook that was the same price as the regular because, generally, I only buy mass market paperbacks and those are plenty cheap enough for me, especially with a 10% discount, and I dont like to think that author royalties might be being cut into. However, I do not think I could for a second stand behind the decision as pertains to libraries. Faced with choosing between buying a digital copy of a mass market several times or buying a masmarket that ten times as many people are going to find and love - I can imagine which a library, many of which are sturggling to stay open, would chose. I also cant imagine the choice working for the favor of publishing companies. When I was desperate for a book, but low on cash (happens often at my age), I took whatever format that library had - I am sure there are plenty of people out there who are just the same. In the end, I think publishers will be hurting (if that&#039;s possible...), because that option just seems untenable in the long run.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont have an ereader but I am thinking about getting one. As for pricing, I would not mind buying an ebook that was the same price as the regular because, generally, I only buy mass market paperbacks and those are plenty cheap enough for me, especially with a 10% discount, and I dont like to think that author royalties might be being cut into. However, I do not think I could for a second stand behind the decision as pertains to libraries. Faced with choosing between buying a digital copy of a mass market several times or buying a masmarket that ten times as many people are going to find and love &#8211; I can imagine which a library, many of which are sturggling to stay open, would chose. I also cant imagine the choice working for the favor of publishing companies. When I was desperate for a book, but low on cash (happens often at my age), I took whatever format that library had &#8211; I am sure there are plenty of people out there who are just the same. In the end, I think publishers will be hurting (if that&#8217;s possible&#8230;), because that option just seems untenable in the long run.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Rolls</title>
		<link>http://www.likesbooks.com/blog/?p=6051&#038;cpage=2#comment-29945</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Rolls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 02:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.likesbooks.com/blog/?p=6051#comment-29945</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-29939&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-29939&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Leigh AAR&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: Elizabeth Rolls – that is crazy.I just finished a book by an English author and loved the brief introduction to life there.The slang words, brand names were almost as entertaining as the story.I would love to visit Australia, and reading a book based there while not quite the same, would at least allow me to visit in my imagination.

&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Well, would you believe that I occasionally get letters from American readers correcting my spelling - my books use UK English - and even punctuation, because the London office house style is single quotation marks for direct speech. Early North American editions of Harry Potter and the Philosopher&#039;s/Sorceror&#039;s Stone changed various things, like Mom instead of Mum, booger instead of bogies, to make it more comprehensible to U.S readers. Admittedly we&#039;re dealing with kids reading the books, but kids are not stupid.
I agree that it&#039;s crazy, but the view is that readers like familiarity and the bottom line is that publishers will always cater to the majority. The thing to remember is that readers here at AAR are not necessarily typical of the majority of readers. Readers and reviewers here, and at other similar sites and blogs, might express the same view that you have, Leigh, but unless the Market Gods are convinced it is a majority view, they aren&#039;t interested.
Take Susan Elizabeth Philips&#039; football books. You could just as easily have had an Australian author decide to write the same type of series set around our national football game. Assuming the author had SEP&#039;s level of talent, would it get the U.S audience? Quite probably not. Unless SEP wrote it, and I&#039;m blowed if I know why she would, or should.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="comment-29939">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-29939" rel="nofollow">Leigh AAR</a></strong>: Elizabeth Rolls – that is crazy.I just finished a book by an English author and loved the brief introduction to life there.The slang words, brand names were almost as entertaining as the story.I would love to visit Australia, and reading a book based there while not quite the same, would at least allow me to visit in my imagination.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Well, would you believe that I occasionally get letters from American readers correcting my spelling &#8211; my books use UK English &#8211; and even punctuation, because the London office house style is single quotation marks for direct speech. Early North American editions of Harry Potter and the Philosopher&#8217;s/Sorceror&#8217;s Stone changed various things, like Mom instead of Mum, booger instead of bogies, to make it more comprehensible to U.S readers. Admittedly we&#8217;re dealing with kids reading the books, but kids are not stupid.<br />
I agree that it&#8217;s crazy, but the view is that readers like familiarity and the bottom line is that publishers will always cater to the majority. The thing to remember is that readers here at AAR are not necessarily typical of the majority of readers. Readers and reviewers here, and at other similar sites and blogs, might express the same view that you have, Leigh, but unless the Market Gods are convinced it is a majority view, they aren&#8217;t interested.<br />
Take Susan Elizabeth Philips&#8217; football books. You could just as easily have had an Australian author decide to write the same type of series set around our national football game. Assuming the author had SEP&#8217;s level of talent, would it get the U.S audience? Quite probably not. Unless SEP wrote it, and I&#8217;m blowed if I know why she would, or should.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leigh AAR</title>
		<link>http://www.likesbooks.com/blog/?p=6051&#038;cpage=2#comment-29942</link>
		<dc:creator>Leigh AAR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 01:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.likesbooks.com/blog/?p=6051#comment-29942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jo-Anne W.  I should do the same thing, instead of just complaining.  Until more competition comes from indie authors, I think we are stuck with agency pricing.  The projected growth of e-readers is like 40 million this next year. 

Tinabelle, like you I love my kindle, and it is my preferred way of reading books. But over the next six months, I am going to consciously pick the least expensive route for books, whether library, paper, or e-book.  I am not saying, I won&#039;t buy e-books.  It is so tempting.  But I am going to try do utilized some delayed gratification.  A pretty big challenge for me with books (grin)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jo-Anne W.  I should do the same thing, instead of just complaining.  Until more competition comes from indie authors, I think we are stuck with agency pricing.  The projected growth of e-readers is like 40 million this next year. </p>
<p>Tinabelle, like you I love my kindle, and it is my preferred way of reading books. But over the next six months, I am going to consciously pick the least expensive route for books, whether library, paper, or e-book.  I am not saying, I won&#8217;t buy e-books.  It is so tempting.  But I am going to try do utilized some delayed gratification.  A pretty big challenge for me with books (grin)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leigh AAR</title>
		<link>http://www.likesbooks.com/blog/?p=6051&#038;cpage=2#comment-29939</link>
		<dc:creator>Leigh AAR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 01:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.likesbooks.com/blog/?p=6051#comment-29939</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Elizabeth Rolls - that is crazy.  I just finished a book by an English author and loved the brief introduction to life there.  The slang words, brand names were almost as entertaining as the story.  I would love to visit Australia, and reading a book based there while not quite the same, would at least allow me to visit in my imagination.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elizabeth Rolls &#8211; that is crazy.  I just finished a book by an English author and loved the brief introduction to life there.  The slang words, brand names were almost as entertaining as the story.  I would love to visit Australia, and reading a book based there while not quite the same, would at least allow me to visit in my imagination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tinabelle</title>
		<link>http://www.likesbooks.com/blog/?p=6051&#038;cpage=1#comment-29909</link>
		<dc:creator>Tinabelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 17:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.likesbooks.com/blog/?p=6051#comment-29909</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although I am not happy about the spread of the agency model to other publishers,  I have accepted it for now.  This model, along with the economy, has reduced my book buying slightly over the last year.  I read new authors from the library rather than risk a fullprice purchase, and I am more selective about what I buy so there are consequences of lost sales.

That said, I confess that I have not bought a paper fiction book since I got my Kindle 3 years ago.  I am a big rereader and just don&#039;t have any space to store books anymore.  Plus, I love reading on my Kindle.  Unlike a lot of others, the authors I want to read are mostly published by the agency model group.  I have learned that I can take a pass on many books if the ebook is overpriced.  Although it grates, I am willing to pay the same price for an ebook but I will NOT pay more.  I can only compromise so much.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I am not happy about the spread of the agency model to other publishers,  I have accepted it for now.  This model, along with the economy, has reduced my book buying slightly over the last year.  I read new authors from the library rather than risk a fullprice purchase, and I am more selective about what I buy so there are consequences of lost sales.</p>
<p>That said, I confess that I have not bought a paper fiction book since I got my Kindle 3 years ago.  I am a big rereader and just don&#8217;t have any space to store books anymore.  Plus, I love reading on my Kindle.  Unlike a lot of others, the authors I want to read are mostly published by the agency model group.  I have learned that I can take a pass on many books if the ebook is overpriced.  Although it grates, I am willing to pay the same price for an ebook but I will NOT pay more.  I can only compromise so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jo-Ann W.</title>
		<link>http://www.likesbooks.com/blog/?p=6051&#038;cpage=1#comment-29893</link>
		<dc:creator>Jo-Ann W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 15:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.likesbooks.com/blog/?p=6051#comment-29893</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every time I see an ebook priced the same or more as the print book, I write the publisher and tell them I won&#039;t be buying from them anymore until they change their pricing.  And I mean it.  There are tons of avenues to get books from so the publisher doesn&#039;t get any money.  I tell them that too because it seems as if they&#039;re too stupid to realize that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every time I see an ebook priced the same or more as the print book, I write the publisher and tell them I won&#8217;t be buying from them anymore until they change their pricing.  And I mean it.  There are tons of avenues to get books from so the publisher doesn&#8217;t get any money.  I tell them that too because it seems as if they&#8217;re too stupid to realize that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
