I don’t read vampire anymore, so I am not currently reading the vampire books by Davidson, Harris, or Armstrong. But I do remember when they were released. They seemed so unique.

I guess I associate quirky with groundbreaking. . . I not sure that I consider Cheryl Reavis’ books quirky, but they are excellent. I wish she had a new one coming out.

I do like groundbreaking but not too outside the box. . . Too much of a traditionalist romance reader.

Great topic. . . .

Michael is a bisexual male who is struggling to recover from the loss of his partner of twelve years, while trying to be a father to their increasingly hostile daughter, Andie. Rebecca, is a withdrawn former Hollywood sitcom actress who has seemingly moved on with her life after being physically and emotionally scarred at the hands of a crazed stalker. Definitely not my usual pick for a romance.

The author, however, has managed to write a beautiful, tender love story about two lost souls, who eventually reach out and find each other. I went through a box of tissues reading this one.

kathy: Xina; You took the books right out of my mouth so to speak. I LOVED all of those books.

Yes..me too!

I’d consider Jane Green’s ‘Good in Bed’ quirky.

Another one, is ‘The Madness of Lord Ian Mackenzie’ by Jennifer Ashley. Very odd.

Another series I love is Ruth Downie’s. The first book is Medicus. It’s historical mystery but the love story through-out the series is definitely quirky.

I love quirky romances and seek them out! Thanks for the recommendations.