<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Correcting Author Mistakes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.likesbooks.com/blog/Index.php?feed=rss2&#038;p=4833" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.likesbooks.com/blog/?p=4833</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 04:47:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean Wan</title>
		<link>http://www.likesbooks.com/blog/?p=4833&#038;cpage=1#comment-14965</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean Wan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 05:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.likesbooks.com/blog/?p=4833#comment-14965</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve actually never noticed any glaring factual errors except in two books, which (I&#039;m pretty sure) mistook some facts about classical music, but I couldn&#039;t be bothered in pointing them out beyond this space (and for one book, in a review).  Some errors are too blanketing to even bother about - taking historical liberties with dress, speech, some legal matters, etc. - and if the author has taken the time to point out that they have taken liberties, then there&#039;s no point.

My main pet peeve is the misuse of French.  Some errors are minor; some are major, as if the author didn&#039;t even bother to look up the basics beyond &quot;oui&quot; and &quot;non&quot;.  But I&#039;ve never felt the need to inform the authors/publishers personally.  My two cents: There are multilingual readers who can tell the difference.  Just saying.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve actually never noticed any glaring factual errors except in two books, which (I&#8217;m pretty sure) mistook some facts about classical music, but I couldn&#8217;t be bothered in pointing them out beyond this space (and for one book, in a review).  Some errors are too blanketing to even bother about &#8211; taking historical liberties with dress, speech, some legal matters, etc. &#8211; and if the author has taken the time to point out that they have taken liberties, then there&#8217;s no point.</p>
<p>My main pet peeve is the misuse of French.  Some errors are minor; some are major, as if the author didn&#8217;t even bother to look up the basics beyond &#8220;oui&#8221; and &#8220;non&#8221;.  But I&#8217;ve never felt the need to inform the authors/publishers personally.  My two cents: There are multilingual readers who can tell the difference.  Just saying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy</title>
		<link>http://www.likesbooks.com/blog/?p=4833&#038;cpage=1#comment-14945</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 18:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.likesbooks.com/blog/?p=4833#comment-14945</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have to admit that I pointed out an error to an author who -- while her writing was somewhat enjoyable -- was not a very nice person on various message boards (knew more than anyone else, was always correct because she was so smart, etc.).  In her first book there were descriptions of horses, carriages, and the tack needed to attach the former to the latter.  The descriptions were somewhat inaccurate but didn&#039;t bother me that much (I am a &quot;horse person&quot;).  But part of the action involved a situation whereby the horse and the carriage became unattached while in motion -- and the hero is reaching down from the carriage to grab a piece of tack in an attempt to regain control; only problem was the pieces described wouldn&#039;t have had any impact on the control issue and would have most likely caused the hero to be pulled from the carriage and then run over.  I wrote a note explaining how the items described wouldn&#039;t have worked -- and also indicated the correct items.  The response?  How dare I presume to offer criticism... the author knew all and knew that she was correct.    Oh well - I tried but because of that response I&#039;ve never read another one of her books.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to admit that I pointed out an error to an author who &#8212; while her writing was somewhat enjoyable &#8212; was not a very nice person on various message boards (knew more than anyone else, was always correct because she was so smart, etc.).  In her first book there were descriptions of horses, carriages, and the tack needed to attach the former to the latter.  The descriptions were somewhat inaccurate but didn&#8217;t bother me that much (I am a &#8220;horse person&#8221;).  But part of the action involved a situation whereby the horse and the carriage became unattached while in motion &#8212; and the hero is reaching down from the carriage to grab a piece of tack in an attempt to regain control; only problem was the pieces described wouldn&#8217;t have had any impact on the control issue and would have most likely caused the hero to be pulled from the carriage and then run over.  I wrote a note explaining how the items described wouldn&#8217;t have worked &#8212; and also indicated the correct items.  The response?  How dare I presume to offer criticism&#8230; the author knew all and knew that she was correct.    Oh well &#8211; I tried but because of that response I&#8217;ve never read another one of her books.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoAnne</title>
		<link>http://www.likesbooks.com/blog/?p=4833&#038;cpage=1#comment-14871</link>
		<dc:creator>JoAnne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 18:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.likesbooks.com/blog/?p=4833#comment-14871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While I&#039;m not a hockey fan, I do spend a lot of time in rinks as a figure skater, instructor and competition official.  I&#039;ve read Gibson&#039;s hockey stories and don&#039;t remember anything egregiously wrong with them (mostly I thought the characters were a bit on the cardboard side).  

But it irks me to no end when authors throw in skating details so wrong that it&#039;s obvious the closest they&#039;ve ever come to a rink is watching Disney on Ice.  The tell-tale to me is when the plot involves a competitive skater at the National or World Championships and the scores are announced as &quot;perfect 10s&quot;.  Figure skating - at least on the Olympic end of it has never used 10 as a scoring base.  The older system  had 6.0 as the top mark (and it was &quot;marks&quot; and not &quot;score.&quot;)  About abou six years ago the scoring system was changed to a &quot;Code of Points&quot; system where the highest total points wins and scores (Yes, &quot;scores&quot;) at the world and national levels are in the 100s.  The only event sthat used &quot;10&quot; as a mark were some made-for-tv professional competitions that had celebrity judges and featured skaters no longer competiting at the Olympic level;  they were more shows than competitions since everybody got paid just to show up and very often the audience got to vote along with the panel.

The only time I wrote to an author though was when one had her Regency heroine lacing up white figure skates for a turn around the pond.  White skates didn&#039;t exist until the early 20th century when Sonja Henie  introduced them to shocase her tiny feet.  Back in Regency days, skates were just blades that strapped on to regular shoes.  I don&#039;t remember the exact response but it was basically, &quot;Oh, no one toher than a figure skating historian would know that so who cares.&quot;  I&#039;ve never read another of that author&#039;s work.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I&#8217;m not a hockey fan, I do spend a lot of time in rinks as a figure skater, instructor and competition official.  I&#8217;ve read Gibson&#8217;s hockey stories and don&#8217;t remember anything egregiously wrong with them (mostly I thought the characters were a bit on the cardboard side).  </p>
<p>But it irks me to no end when authors throw in skating details so wrong that it&#8217;s obvious the closest they&#8217;ve ever come to a rink is watching Disney on Ice.  The tell-tale to me is when the plot involves a competitive skater at the National or World Championships and the scores are announced as &#8220;perfect 10s&#8221;.  Figure skating &#8211; at least on the Olympic end of it has never used 10 as a scoring base.  The older system  had 6.0 as the top mark (and it was &#8220;marks&#8221; and not &#8220;score.&#8221;)  About abou six years ago the scoring system was changed to a &#8220;Code of Points&#8221; system where the highest total points wins and scores (Yes, &#8220;scores&#8221;) at the world and national levels are in the 100s.  The only event sthat used &#8220;10&#8243; as a mark were some made-for-tv professional competitions that had celebrity judges and featured skaters no longer competiting at the Olympic level;  they were more shows than competitions since everybody got paid just to show up and very often the audience got to vote along with the panel.</p>
<p>The only time I wrote to an author though was when one had her Regency heroine lacing up white figure skates for a turn around the pond.  White skates didn&#8217;t exist until the early 20th century when Sonja Henie  introduced them to shocase her tiny feet.  Back in Regency days, skates were just blades that strapped on to regular shoes.  I don&#8217;t remember the exact response but it was basically, &#8220;Oh, no one toher than a figure skating historian would know that so who cares.&#8221;  I&#8217;ve never read another of that author&#8217;s work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellen AAR</title>
		<link>http://www.likesbooks.com/blog/?p=4833&#038;cpage=1#comment-14870</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellen AAR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 17:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.likesbooks.com/blog/?p=4833#comment-14870</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve done it a time or two, usually when the author makes a mistake about a Catholic topic.  One of the biggest ones (and everyone seems to make this) is calling someone who is trying to be a nun, but who has not yet taken her final vows, a novitiate.  She&#039;s a novice.  The novitiate is the name of the place where the novices live.

And getting titles wrong really, really bothers me as well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve done it a time or two, usually when the author makes a mistake about a Catholic topic.  One of the biggest ones (and everyone seems to make this) is calling someone who is trying to be a nun, but who has not yet taken her final vows, a novitiate.  She&#8217;s a novice.  The novitiate is the name of the place where the novices live.</p>
<p>And getting titles wrong really, really bothers me as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leslie Kelly</title>
		<link>http://www.likesbooks.com/blog/?p=4833&#038;cpage=1#comment-14756</link>
		<dc:creator>Leslie Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 17:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.likesbooks.com/blog/?p=4833#comment-14756</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have had a few notes like this over the years and, with only one exception, had no problem receiving them. I&#039;m human--I make mistakes. And, probably like a lot of authors, I work on a book so long that at a certain point, the words begin to glaze in front of my eyes and my mind fills in stuff that I think is there...but really isn&#039;t. 

The only time I got annoyed was when a reader sent me a really NASTY email saying how stupid and lazy I was for getting the name of a movie wrong. I&#039;d mentioned Philadelphia Story instead of High Society...same story, one was the musical with Bing Crosby, one the non-musical with Cary Grant. Anyway, I gritted my teeth and wrote back to thank her, only to get an instant-reply that my email was blocked from writing to her! Which told me she just wanted the chance to ream me out.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have had a few notes like this over the years and, with only one exception, had no problem receiving them. I&#8217;m human&#8211;I make mistakes. And, probably like a lot of authors, I work on a book so long that at a certain point, the words begin to glaze in front of my eyes and my mind fills in stuff that I think is there&#8230;but really isn&#8217;t. </p>
<p>The only time I got annoyed was when a reader sent me a really NASTY email saying how stupid and lazy I was for getting the name of a movie wrong. I&#8217;d mentioned Philadelphia Story instead of High Society&#8230;same story, one was the musical with Bing Crosby, one the non-musical with Cary Grant. Anyway, I gritted my teeth and wrote back to thank her, only to get an instant-reply that my email was blocked from writing to her! Which told me she just wanted the chance to ream me out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leslie Kelly</title>
		<link>http://www.likesbooks.com/blog/?p=4833&#038;cpage=1#comment-14755</link>
		<dc:creator>Leslie Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 17:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.likesbooks.com/blog/?p=4833#comment-14755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-14685&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-14685&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Danielle D&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: I just got done reading a book were the heroine lives in Chicago — instead of calling Michigan Avenue the Magnificant Mile she called it the Miracle Mile which is in Los Angeles. I have to admit that it took me right out ofthe book.No, I didn’t write the author!
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Was it mine? Cause I did that once...felt like a total idiot once I actually got the book in print and read it. I did know better, just had a complete brain fart!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="comment-14685">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-14685" rel="nofollow">Danielle D</a></strong>: I just got done reading a book were the heroine lives in Chicago — instead of calling Michigan Avenue the Magnificant Mile she called it the Miracle Mile which is in Los Angeles. I have to admit that it took me right out ofthe book.No, I didn’t write the author!
</p></blockquote>
<p>Was it mine? Cause I did that once&#8230;felt like a total idiot once I actually got the book in print and read it. I did know better, just had a complete brain fart!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Rolls</title>
		<link>http://www.likesbooks.com/blog/?p=4833&#038;cpage=1#comment-14752</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Rolls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 13:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.likesbooks.com/blog/?p=4833#comment-14752</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting comment, Julie. I do competition judging from time to time and I try very hard NOT to grade down because of historical inaccuracy. In fact most comps ask you not to grade down for that reason, but to concentrate on the writing. So I strike a compromise - I point out what I believe to be a mistake, but with the caveat that I might be wrong, and also that a lot of people won&#039;t care one way or the other. I make it a stronger comment if the error touches on the premise of the story - marriages dissolved in a heartbeat, illegitimate daughters inheriting dukedoms, that sort of stuff. I also make it clear that I am not marking down, just including the comment for the writer&#039;s use. And let&#039;s face it, I might be wrong. It&#039;s been known to happen. Although I admit, I&#039;d have to grade down if I found a camera popping up in Regency England - or anywhere else in that time frame.

Elizabeth]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting comment, Julie. I do competition judging from time to time and I try very hard NOT to grade down because of historical inaccuracy. In fact most comps ask you not to grade down for that reason, but to concentrate on the writing. So I strike a compromise &#8211; I point out what I believe to be a mistake, but with the caveat that I might be wrong, and also that a lot of people won&#8217;t care one way or the other. I make it a stronger comment if the error touches on the premise of the story &#8211; marriages dissolved in a heartbeat, illegitimate daughters inheriting dukedoms, that sort of stuff. I also make it clear that I am not marking down, just including the comment for the writer&#8217;s use. And let&#8217;s face it, I might be wrong. It&#8217;s been known to happen. Although I admit, I&#8217;d have to grade down if I found a camera popping up in Regency England &#8211; or anywhere else in that time frame.</p>
<p>Elizabeth</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JulieLeto</title>
		<link>http://www.likesbooks.com/blog/?p=4833&#038;cpage=1#comment-14743</link>
		<dc:creator>JulieLeto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 04:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.likesbooks.com/blog/?p=4833#comment-14743</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know the poll says that 93% of people responding to the poll do not write the author, but somebody is, that&#039;s for sure.  I&#039;ve gotten a few notes myself.

Mistakes happen.  Sometimes, the &quot;mistake&quot; is not a mistake at all.  I&#039;ve had people write to me to tell me something was wrong, when in fact, it wasn&#039;t.  I had a reviewer take down the score on a baseball book I was involved in (an anthology) because we had a pro team possibly moving to Las Vegas--this reviewer insisted this was impossible because of all these laws.  (I can&#039;t remember the details...it was a while ago.)

This was not something we researched, to be honest.  I believed the reviewer.  (Book was out, nothing I could do.)  But guess what?  I live in Tampa and the Rays might move if they don&#039;t get a new stadium and guess where they might go?  Las Vegas.

So who is right?

Before I was published, I had a historical romance author grade down a contest entry I&#039;d submitted because of &quot;historical inaccuracy.&quot;  I&#039;d spent months doing research--I knew what I&#039;d written was correct.  So again, who is right?

And does it really matter?

To me, all that matters is if I enjoyed a book.  The characters and the story are much more important than the minutiae.  I&#039;ve never written to an author, probably because I know how hard it is to get all the facts right and because chances are, I could be wrong about what I think is wrong.  However, I will confess that if a book has too many questionable facts, I do put it down.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know the poll says that 93% of people responding to the poll do not write the author, but somebody is, that&#8217;s for sure.  I&#8217;ve gotten a few notes myself.</p>
<p>Mistakes happen.  Sometimes, the &#8220;mistake&#8221; is not a mistake at all.  I&#8217;ve had people write to me to tell me something was wrong, when in fact, it wasn&#8217;t.  I had a reviewer take down the score on a baseball book I was involved in (an anthology) because we had a pro team possibly moving to Las Vegas&#8211;this reviewer insisted this was impossible because of all these laws.  (I can&#8217;t remember the details&#8230;it was a while ago.)</p>
<p>This was not something we researched, to be honest.  I believed the reviewer.  (Book was out, nothing I could do.)  But guess what?  I live in Tampa and the Rays might move if they don&#8217;t get a new stadium and guess where they might go?  Las Vegas.</p>
<p>So who is right?</p>
<p>Before I was published, I had a historical romance author grade down a contest entry I&#8217;d submitted because of &#8220;historical inaccuracy.&#8221;  I&#8217;d spent months doing research&#8211;I knew what I&#8217;d written was correct.  So again, who is right?</p>
<p>And does it really matter?</p>
<p>To me, all that matters is if I enjoyed a book.  The characters and the story are much more important than the minutiae.  I&#8217;ve never written to an author, probably because I know how hard it is to get all the facts right and because chances are, I could be wrong about what I think is wrong.  However, I will confess that if a book has too many questionable facts, I do put it down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chartreuse</title>
		<link>http://www.likesbooks.com/blog/?p=4833&#038;cpage=1#comment-14719</link>
		<dc:creator>Chartreuse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 21:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.likesbooks.com/blog/?p=4833#comment-14719</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In historicals set in Britain it&#039;s jarring to see a peer or the heir apparent to an earl, marquess, or duke, called Lord Firstname Lastname by someone who should know better.  I like to let experienced authors know they&#039;ve blown it, because if they pay attention, it makes their next efforts more readable.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In historicals set in Britain it&#8217;s jarring to see a peer or the heir apparent to an earl, marquess, or duke, called Lord Firstname Lastname by someone who should know better.  I like to let experienced authors know they&#8217;ve blown it, because if they pay attention, it makes their next efforts more readable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane O</title>
		<link>http://www.likesbooks.com/blog/?p=4833&#038;cpage=1#comment-14704</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 14:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.likesbooks.com/blog/?p=4833#comment-14704</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I figure by the time I&#039;m reading it, the book is in print and it&#039;s too late for corrections, but I do remember being irritated when an author attributed Leonardo&#039;s Mona Lisa to Michaelangelo, especially since the painting was referred to several times in the book.  Somebody should have caught that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I figure by the time I&#8217;m reading it, the book is in print and it&#8217;s too late for corrections, but I do remember being irritated when an author attributed Leonardo&#8217;s Mona Lisa to Michaelangelo, especially since the painting was referred to several times in the book.  Somebody should have caught that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
