My Guilty TV Pleasure

NUP_112606_0572 I have to admit it. I’m a lawyer, and even though I should know better, I can’t stop watching Law & Order. Even when the prosecutors are making some truly cringeworthy mistakes of law, I can’t tear myself away. The early seasons of the show actually offered some good legal lessons (and at various points, some quality Chris Noth viewing – not that Jeremy Sisto is hard on the eyes nowadays), but later seasons have gone further afield. In the past few seasons, I can’t think of an episode featuring a case anything like one that the lawyers I know would ever encounter. Still, the strained reasoning and “ripped from the headlines” craziness is entertaining, I like the different personalities of the characters, and I can’t stop watching even if it is so completely implausible.

It’s rather like when I used to watch JAG with friends who were actual JAG officers. I knew that the JAG Corps wasn’t singlehandedly keeping the world safe for truth, justice and the American Way, but it was still fun television. So it is with Law & Order. After days of the usual frustrations that come with putting together and trying real-life cases, there’s something delightful about entering a world where you can so effortlessly get around the rules of evidence. Oh, for the ability to get my neighborhood gossip/triple hearsay into evidence so easily!

In Law & Order-land, you can:

-get from commission of crime through investigation, trial prep and all the way to the verdict in an hour

-wear spiky heels for hours without limping or taking the occasional header into the jury box

-buy designer suits on a prosecutor’s salary

-spend shockingly little time in one’s office slaving over actual case files and research (yeah – I wish my trials would prep themselves, too)

-always have a witty magistrate at arraignment

-win your case even if your only major witness gets completely annihilated on cross examination

-have 2 intrepid attorneys who apparently have no support staff take on everything from small-time thugs to big corporations without going mad as they drown in paper case files

-jurisdiction? Who cares about mundane things such as boundaries? If the crime happened somewhere kinda near Manhattan, we’ll find a way to get our detectives out there to investigate.

Must be nice. Then again, some of the drudgery involved in real-life legal practice wouldn’t make for the most dramatic television.

Even better, on Law & Order, the good guys don’t always win, but they certainly do get to tilt at some windmills they would probably never even get to touch in real life. After all, Jack McCoy has gotten to take on cults, terrorists, organized crime and big, eeeevil corporations, just to name a few. A fortunate lawyer might get the opportunity to launch the occasional crusade of this sort, but Jack gets to do a few every season. It may be unrealistic(and the legal reasoning sometimes tenuous), but it’s great fun to watch. After all, the current ADA Cutter may be good, but no one gives a closing argument like Jack McCoy.

I could do without the political correctness that seems to get more heavyhanded every season, but the theatrical nature of Law & Order will never lose its appeal for me. The issues in a case are rarely so clearcut in real life as they are in Law & Order-land’s New York, but after a day of dealing with the ambiguities inherent in real cases or a rather untheater-ready hearing, the TV courtroom makes for a much-needed escape. And picking out the “You have GOT to be kidding me!” moments is almost as much fun as focusing on the plot itself.

-Lynn Spencer

Tags: , ,

10 Responses to “My Guilty TV Pleasure”

  1. AAR Sandy says:

    I definitely did my time in Law and Order land. There is something very addictive about everything getting all tied up (though not always neatly) in an hour.

    I totally do not get the Chris Noth thing. He just seems kind of simian to me.

    Have you ever noticed how many wealthy women are committing murder in the city of New York? Seems like an epidemic to me.

  2. Katie Mack says:

    I watched L&O like crazy for a long time, before finally burning myself out on it. For the most part I really like the show, but the “ripped from the headlines” episodes always bugged me. Too tabloid-ish for my tastes.

    JAG. Oh, how I miss JAG. I didn’t care that it wasn’t realistic–seriously, what TV show truly is?–it was just plain fun to watch. And David James Elliott? Mmm, mmm, mmm.

  3. Kara says:

    Being a Paralegal – I cringe at some of the legal creative license too – but I love the show and have been addicted to it since if first started.

    I miss JAG too – especially the eye-candy – LOL!!

  4. mingqi says:

    oh Law and Order! I don’t seek to watch it every week, but once i start an episode, I can’t stop. The characters Cutter and McCoy are great to watch! I’m a bit more into Law and Order: SVU. The crimes are really heinous, but there is a lot of emotional content in SVU. I also love Mariska Hartigay and Chris Meloni!

  5. RobinB says:

    I’m also more of a “Law & Order SVU” person myself, but I really liked the earlier years of “L&O”. Loved the late great Jerry Orbach, and yes, also Chris Noth (the main reason I started watching “Sex and the City”!). “SVU” has the best cast of any of the “L&O” shows and the stories are very fascinating. Can’t get into “Criminal Intent” because I can only take so much of Vincent D’Onofrio. He was excellent as a guest star several years ago on a terrific series called “Homicide: Life on the Street”, but on “Criminal Intent”, he chews the scenery nonstop!

  6. Magdalen says:

    I understand completely about the eye-rolling that any lawyer must endure to watch the plain vanilla L&O. I won’t accept criminal cases in my rural county in Pennsylvania, but for all I know our judge (yup, only one judge) runs those not unlike an L&O episode. Goodness knows he runs the family law cases (dependency and termination of parental rights) that way — talk about your triple hearsay & neighborhood gossip. And he’s been quoted as saying he won’t let precedential case law get in the way of his decisions. (I’d laugh, but it’s all too depressing for my clients whose kids are in foster care based solely on idiotic evidence like that.)

    But I did crow at a recent L&O episode with Swoozie Kurtz as a martinet judge who turns out to have been taking kickbacks to send juveniles to specific institutions — that case was ripped from the Wilkes-Barre headlines, as two state court judges have allegedly accepted more than $1 million in bribes from a guy who owns/operates a juvenile facility. Sad cases, but you rather feel like you’ve made it when its a nearby case that ends up on L&O.

    I’ve been a fan of Sam Waterston’s for years — talk about chewing the scenery! (I actually think he’s got less of a defense than D’Onofrio, whose character is probably got Asperger’s or something.) And I’m really enjoying Jeff Goldblum’s new gig.

  7. Ellis Gibson says:

    Are they not going to change the cast of Sex and The City ? the girls in there are getting old already.’`;

  8. Jake Lewis says:

    Are they not going to change the cast of Sex and The City ? the girls in there are getting old already.,~;

  9. You probably ought to explore widening a person’s internet site, these kinds of sort of threads are quite enlightening. The truth is, you could possibly in all probability generate a pair greenbacks just by adding some more promotions!

  10. bettingroulette.co.uk roulette betting